Understanding
evolutionary paradigm of knockdown resistance in mosquitoes by analyzing DNA
sequence polymorphisms in the voltage-gated sodium channel in Culex quinquefasciatus<=
span
lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times =
New Roman","serif";
mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>
Manas Sarkar1*,
Aparajita Borkotoki2, Indra Baruah1
1Medical Entomology Division, Defence Research
Laboratory (DRDO), Tezpur�784001, Assam, India
2Department of Zoology, Gauhati University, Guwahat=
i, Assam,
India
*Corresponding author
(Present address): Centre for Medical Entomology & Vector
Management, National Centre for Disease Control, 22-Sham Nath Marg,
Delhi-110054, India.
E-mail: [email protected]
Graphical Abstract�
Abstract:� The Vol=
tage
Gated Sodium Channel (VGSC) is
critical for binding of different insecticides and plays a key role in
insecticide resistance. The insect sodium channel consists of four homologo=
us
domains (I to IV), each containing six transmembrane segments (S1 to S6). An
important mechanism of resistance to DDT and pyrethroids is termed knockdown
resistance (kdr), caused by a s=
ingle
nucleotide polymorphism in the IIS6 domain of sodium channels. We analyzed =
the
polymorphisms, nucleotide diversity, and phylogenies in the vgsc-IIS6 gene in Culex quinquefasciatus<=
/i>
from
Keywords: Knockdown resistance; insecticide resistance; molecular evolution;
neutral theory; natural selection; India
Introduction
Culex quinquefa=
sciatus
is the principal vector of bancroftian filariasis on the Indian subcontinen=
t.
Control of this vector has relied extensively on application of insecticide=
s1.
Because of continued and/or indiscriminate use of insecticides, increased
resistance, especially against DDT has been observed in this part of the wo=
rld2.
DDT and pyrethroids share a similar target site, t=
he
para-type voltage-gated sodium channel (vgsc).
It alters the normal functions of the sodium channel. The prolonged channel
opening causes increased nerve impulse transmission, leading to paralysis a=
nd
death of the insect3, 4.
The transmembrane structure of para-type VGSC consists of four internally
homologous domains (I�IV), each having six transmembrane helices (S1�S6).
Extensive research has shown that kdr or kdr-like mechanisms have resulted =
in
mutations in sodium channels5. Mutations in the domain-II region=
of
the channel are commonly responsible for insecticide resistance. A single
nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (A to T) in the S6 hydrophobic transmembrane
segment of domain-II of vgsc co=
nfers
insensitivity to pyrethroid and DDT. This resistance mechanism is known as
knockdown resistance (kdr) and has been reported in many insects, such as Musca domestica6, Blattella germanica7 an=
d Heliothis virescens8, 9.
Mosquitoes with the kdr phenotype display a high level of resistance to both
pyrethroids and DDT10-17.
Insecticide-binding simulation studies of vgsc with DDT and pyrethroids show=
ed
that most of the mutations conferring insecticide resistance were located in
the domain-II of the vgsc gene<=
sup>18,
19. However, information regarding the evolutionary pattern of this g=
ene
and knowledge of its phylogenetic lineage are not available for Culex mosquitoes. In Anopheles gambiae, there is eviden=
ce for
the multiple origin of kdr mutation in Africa20. In Culex, there is no published study=
so
far on polymorphisms, nucleotide, and/or genetic diversity and phylogeny of=
vgsc associated with the molecular
evolutionary pattern.
We, therefore, analyzed the polymorphisms and
nucleotide diversities in the vgsc<=
/i>-IIS6
gene to gain insight into the evolutionary forces at work in the
insecticide-binding domain of the v=
gsc
gene conferring resistance to a population of Cx. quinquefasciatus from
northeastern
Materials and
Methods
Mosquito population and
bioassays
In order to carry out the tests for selection base=
d on
allele frequencies, especially with relatively small sample size, it is
important to assemble random samples from a population rather than ascertai=
ned
samples. We have assembled random samples of adult Cx. quinquefasciatus from
foothill areas of� Assam, northeast=
ern
India (26�48′43.0′′N, 92�35′39.3′′E;
26�51′47.4′′N, 92�33′48.7′′E;
26�51′48.4′′N, 92�32′27.6′′E;
26�50′45.3′′N, 92�35′33.2′′E). We
considered these mosquitoes as a single population, because the collection
sites are relatively close to each other. Insecticide susceptibility assays
were performed on wild caught adult female mosquitoes using the WHO adult
bioassay kit21. Mortality was determined 24 hours post-exposure.
Resistance status of wild populations was compared to a susceptible referen=
ce
strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus, known as S�Lab, which was collected from Tezp=
ur
city of
Gene Amplification and
Sequencing of PCR products
In this study, we amplified and sequenced IIS6 dom=
ain
of vgsc gene from a population =
of Cx. quinquefasciatus collected from
northeastern
PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR
purification kit (Qiagen). A total of 100 PCR samples, 50 numbers each from
knockdown resistant and knockdown susceptible phenotypes were sequenced on =
both
strands using an ABI automated DNA sequencer. Sequences were analyzed using
BLAST program (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Sequences were
submitted to the
Sequence analysis and
polymorphism detection
Single nucleotide polymorphisms in IIS6 domain of =
vgsc were detected as sequence
differences in multiple alignments using CLUSTALW (http://align.genome.jp/). Electrophoregrams were visually inspected using
BioEdit (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/BioEdit.html) and heterozygotes w=
ere
identified24. SNPs were identified as transitions or transversio=
ns
in coding and non-coding regions. Nucleotide diversity, polymorphisms,
divergence, gene flow, and genetic differentiations among the populations
studied were analyzed using DnaSP 5.00.02 (http://www.ub.es/dnasp)25=
sup>.
Analysis of Data and
Molecular Evolutionary Theories
Most intra-population (i.e., the single population
tested for neutrality in this study) data analyses � including estimates of=
DNA
polymorphisms, nucleotide diversity (π) number of segregating sites (S=
),
number of haplotypes (h), haplotype diversity (Hd) � were performed among 1=
00
sequences of the vgsc gene by
subdividing the gene into functional domains (exons and introns). The data =
were
analyzed using DnaSP 5.00.02. We analyzed the neutral model/hypothesis
(alternatively known as the null model; states that the vast majority of
evolutionary changes at the molecular level is caused by random drift of
selectively neutral mutants26), to infer if natural selection is
acting upon the analyzed vgsc g=
ene.
Tajima�s D test27, Fu and Li�s D* and F*28 tests and =
Fu�s
Fs test29 were performed to determine whether the distribution of
nucleotide variation within the samples was consistent with the neutral mod=
el.
Tajima�s D test statistics is defined as the standardized difference between
two estimators of the population mutation rate parameter θ (=3D 4 N =
56;
for an autosomal region of diploid individuals; where N is the effective
population size, and μ is the per-gene or per-site per-generation muta=
tion
rate). One estimator based on the number of segregating sites and other on =
the
average number of pairwise nucleotide differences, which should be equal un=
der
the neutral mutation model and should differ when natural selection affects=
the
genomic region. Fu and Li�s D* test compares two estimators of the populati=
on
mutation rate parameter θ, based on the differences between the number=
of
singletons (mutations appearing only once among the sequences), and the tot=
al
number of mutations28. Fu and Li�s F* test statistics is based on
the differences between the number of singletons and the average number of
nucleotide differences between pairs of sequences28, 30, equation 10=
sup>.
The Fs test statistic29, equation 1 is based on the haplotype (g=
ene)
frequency distribution for a given value of θ derived from the average
number of pair wise nucleotide differences31, equations 19-21. We
performed Coalescent simulations to estimate confidence intervals and exact
P-values (10000 interactions) for Tajima�s D, Fu and Li�s D* and F* test,
nucleotide diversity, linkage disequilibrium, number of haplotype and haplo=
type
diversity test. These simulations were conditioned on the observed number of
segregating sites (S), and thus population size is not a factor.
Results and Discussion
Bioassays were carried out using 4% DDT and
mortalities were recorded after 24 hour exposure. The mortality of Cx. quinquefasciatus
with DDT ranged from 11.9% to 41.25% whereas mortality in S�Lab insects was
estimated at 91.2%. This bioassay result suggests that Cx. quinquefasciatus
population tested is highly resistant to DDT across all study sites. The
details of insecticide resistance and/or susceptibility status, and detoxif=
ying
enzyme profiles of this population were described in our other publication<=
sup>2.
Detection of kdr mutatio=
n in
wild population of Culex quinquefasciatus
We randomly sampled 50 DDT-resistant and 50
susceptible mosquitoes in search of polymorphisms in the insecticide-binding
segment of vgsc gene. We found =
two
distinct sequence variants (i.e., knockdown susceptible or kds and knockdown
resistance or kdr) after sequencing 100 samples. These two distinct sequence
variants were submitted in GenBank under accession number FJ182226 and
FJ970025. Figure 1 displays the sequence alignment of the knockdown=
-susceptible
and knockdown resistant population, which confirms the presence of the
polymorphic site at position 127 (TTA to TTT) that induces the
substitution of leucine to phenylalanine in resistant mosquitoes, as previo=
usly
reported by others in the same species 14, 15. However, we did not find any A to C mutation as
reported by Wondji et al.15
Neutrality tests and evo=
lutionary
pattern of knockdown resistance
The sequences of the vgsc gene consisted of one exon and one intron region. We found
four parsimony variable sites (127, 155, 157, and 176) in these sequences; =
out
of these one was found in the exon region (A127T, kdr mutatio=
n)
and three in the intron-2 region (Table 1). Polymorphic sites in the intron=
ic
sequences co-segregate with the kdr allele. Statistical analysis of
polymorphism for the entire sequenced region and each functional domain of =
the vgsc gene are summarized in Table =
1. In vgsc, nucleotide diversity in the =
exon
(π/site=3D0.0033) and intron (π/site=3D0.0038) was found to be al=
most
similar when compared with the entire gene (π/site=3D0.0037). However,=
we
observed a higher θ/site value for the intron region in comparison to =
the exon
and entire sequence (Table 1). This is probably due to higher mutation rate=
per
nucleotide per generation in the intronic region.
Figure 1. Alignment
of nucleic acids and corresponding amino acids of IIS6 domain of the para-type sodium channel gene from=
two
representative sequences of knockdown susceptible (FJ182226) and resistant (FJ970025) strain of Culex
quinquefasciatus. Note the A to T change at nucleotide 127 and leucine =
(L)
to phenylalanine (F) at amino acid at 39 in the resistant strain. Alignment
also displays four polymorphic sites: at position 155 (C-A), 157 (T-C) and =
176
(A-G) in the intron-2 region.
The polymorphic sites in different intronic region=
s of
the vgsc gene vary depending on=
the
mosquito species. We observed three polymorphic sites in intron-2 of Cx. quinquefasciatus
whereas Pinto et al.20 reported eight polymorphic sites in intro=
n-1
of the An. gambiae population t=
hat
explain the distinctive pattern of polymorphisms in different intronic regi=
ons
of vgsc in different
populations.�
We performed Fisher�s exact test for independence
between sites (with Bonferroni correction) and Kelly�s ZnS to test linkage
disequilibrium32. Only parsimony informative polymorphic sites w=
ere
considered for the analysis and results are presented in Table 1; there is =
no
evidence of significant nonrandom association between nucleotide variants at
different polymorphic sites (P > 0.1). Recombination per gene in vgsc domain-II was very low (R=3D0=
.001). The minimum number of recombination eve=
nts RM=3D0.
In the presence of non-significant linkage disequilibrium and very low
recombination, it is not unexpected that the estimates of haplotype number =
and
corresponding haplotype diversity for vgsc
do not deviate from the neutral expectations [number of haplotype, h=3D3;
haplotype diversity, Hd=3D0.537 (�0.09) with P=3D0.316] (Table 1 and 2).
Nucleotide variations in synonymous and nonsynonymous sites in vgsc are presented in Table 3. We =
found
no singleton and synonymous mutation (Table 3).
One
method for revealing the influence of selection on a sequence is by examini=
ng
the distribution of segregating variants at that locus in a population and
testing this distribution against the neutral model33. We have u=
sed
the D statistics27, 28 to examine the hypothesis that all
substitutions at the locus are neutral. Several possibilities were explored:
using the whole region sequenced, only the coding region, or only the intro=
n-2.
Where appropriate, the significance of the test or parameter has been verif=
ied
by coalescent simulation (10000 repeats) (Table 2). The detailed results of
neutrality tests including coalescent simulation are presented in Table 1 a=
nd
Table 2. Upon analyses of segregating variation, no statistics (D, F* or Fs)
provide evidence for a significant departure from neutral evolution. The po=
wer
of neutrality test is limited in the presence of recombination34,
but because recombination was very low, this may explain the lack of
significant departure from neutrality. Overall, the evolutionary pattern of
intra-population distribution of variability in the domain-II of the vgsc gene is consistent with the n=
eutral
expectation; hence there is no evidence that positive Darwinian selection h=
as
recently influenced, or is currently influencing, nucleotide variation in t=
his
region of the genome. Hence, there is a possibility that knockdown resistan=
ce (kdr), associated with polymorphism=
in
domain-II of the vgsc gene, may=
be
caused by random drift of selectively neutral mutants. Should we then concl=
ude
that selection did not affect the nucleotide variation in vgsc and evolution of the �kdr trait is largely due to genetic
drift rather than natural selection? The present data are obviously not
sufficient to tell apart the various scenarios that could have led to the
present structure, because information at many independent loci is required=
to
make strong inference on past demographic factors that could affect the
selection processes.
On the other hand, the neutral theory does not rule
out the role of natural selection in certain scenarios of adaptive evolutio=
n - such
patterns are expected from neutrality. Hence, the molecular evolution of th=
e vgsc domain may be dominated by
selectively neutral evolution of segregating variants (polymorphic sites) at
genomic level, but at the phenotypic level, changes in knockdown resistance
were probably dominated by natural selection rather than sampling drift.
Our
observations provoked a hypothesis of possible evolutionary pattern of kdr
allele in Cx. quinquefasciatus. Further critical study with whole vgsc sequences is needed to addres=
s this
problem. At this point, we have no means to claim any definite evolutionary
mechanisms controlling knockdown resistance in mosquito by using the data f=
rom
the present study. We also suspect that the evolutionary puzzle regarding t=
he
origin of knockdown resistance in mosquitoes can be addressed successfully =
by
thorough analysis of intronic polymorphism in the entire vgsc gene between samples from different parts of the world. The
study of a molecular evolutionary pattern of the insecticide-binding domain=
of the
vgsc gene in Cx. quinquefasciatus,
described here, has important academic implications and opens a scope for a=
future
study with a holistic approach to identify definite evolutionary forces at =
work
in knockdown resistance.
Acknowledgments=
b>
The authors sincerely thank Dr. Banalata Sen,
Environmental Health Perspectives (USA) for her careful proofreading of the
draft manuscript. Defence Research & Development Organization (DRDO)
financially support the study.
References<=
/span>�
1.
McCarroll, L. and Heming=
way,
J. (2002). Can insecticide resistance status affect parasite transmission in
mosquitoes? Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.=
32, 1345�1351.
2.
Sarkar, M., Bhattacharyy=
a,
I.K., Borkotoki, A., Goswami, D., Rabha, B., Baruah,
3.
Soderlund, D.M., and Blo=
omquist,
J.R. (1989). Neurotoxic actions of pyrethroid insecticides.� Ann. Rev. Entomol. 34, 77�96.
4.
Narahashi, T. (1992). Ne=
rve
membrane Na+ channels as targets of insecticides. T. Pharmacol. =
Sci.
13, 236�241.
5.&n=
bsp;
Soderlund, D.M. and
6.&n=
bsp;
Williamson, M.S., Denholm, I.,
7.&n=
bsp;
Dong, K., Scott, J.G. (1994). Linkage of kdr-type
resistance and the parahomologue sodium channel gene in German cockroaches
(Blattella germanica). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 24, 647�654.
8.&n=
bsp;
9.&n=
bsp;
McCaffery, A.R., Holloway, J.W., and Gladwell, R.T=
. (1995).
Nerve insensitivity resistance to cypermethrin in larvae of the tobacco bud=
worm
Heliothis virescens from
10.
Chandre, F., Darriet, F.,
Darder, M. et al. (1998). Pyrethroid resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus from
11.
Martinez-Torres, D., Chandr=
e,
F., Williamson, M.S. et al. (1998). Molecular
characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major mala=
ria
vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol. Biol. 7, 179�184.
12.
Martinez-Torres, D., Chevil=
lon,
C., Brun-Barale, A., Berge, J.B., Pasteur, N., and Pauron, D. (1999). Voltage dependent Na+ channels in pyrethroid resistant Culex pipiens L mosquitoes. Pestic=
. Sci.
55, 1012�1020.
13.
McAbee, R.D., Kang, K.D.,
Stanich, M.A. et al. (2004). Pyrethroid toler=
ance
in Culex pipiens pipiens var mo=
lestus
from Marin Country,
14.&=
nbsp;
Xu, Q., Liu, H., Zhang, =
L., and
Liu, N. (2005). Resistance in the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, and possible
mechanisms for resistance.
15.&=
nbsp;
Wondji, C.S., De Silva,
W.A.P.P., Hemingway, J., Hilary, R., and Karunaratne, S.H.P.P. (2008).
Characterization of knockdown resistance in DDT and pyrethroid resistant =
span>Culex qu=
inquefasciatus
population from
16.&=
nbsp;
Zhou, L.,
17.&=
nbsp;
Sarkar, M., Borkotoki, A=
.,
Baruah,
18.
O�Reilly, A.O., Khambay,
B.P., Williamson, M.S., Field, L.M., Wallace, B.A., and Davies, T.G.E. (200=
6).
Modeling insecticide binding sites in the voltage gated sodium channel.
Biochem. J. 396, 255�263.
19.&=
nbsp;
Usherwood, P.N., Davies, T.G., Mellor, I.R., O'Rei=
lly,
A.O., Peng, F., Vais, H., Khambay, B.P., Field, L.M., and Williamson, M.S. =
(2007).
Mutations in DIIS5 and the DIIS4-S5 linker of Drosophila melanogaster sodium
channel define binding domains for pyrethroids and DDT. FEBS Lett. 581 (28), 5485-5492.
20.
Pinto, J., Lynd, A.,
Vicente, J.L., Santolamazza, F., Randle, N.P., Gentile, G.,
21.&=
nbsp;
W.H.O. (1998). Test procedure for insecticide
resistance monitoring in malaria vector, bio-efficacy and persistence of
insecticides on treated surfaces. Document WHO/CDS/CPC/Mal/98.12.
22.
W.H.O. (1992). Vector
resistance to insecticides. 15th Report of the WHO Expert Commit=
tee
on Vector Biology and Control. World Health Organization Technical Report
Series 818,
23.
Coen, E.S., Strachan, T.=
, and
24.
Black, W.C., Baer, C.F.,
Antolin, M.F., and
25.&=
nbsp;
Librado, P., and Rozas, J. (2009). DnaSP v5: A
software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatic=
s:
doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187.
26.&=
nbsp;
Kimura, M. (1983). The neutral theory of Molecular Evolution. (
27.&=
nbsp;
Tajima, =
F. (1989).
Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics =
105, 437-460.
28.&=
nbsp;
Fu, Y.X., Li, W.H. (1993). Statistical tests of
neutrality of mutations. Genetics, =
133, 693-709.
29.&=
nbsp;
Fu, Y.X. (1997). Statistical tests of neutrality of
mutations againstpopulation growth, hitchhiking and background selection. G=
enetics
147, 915-925.
30.&=
nbsp;
Simonsen, K.L., Churchill, G.A., and Aquadro, C.F.=
(1995).
Properties of statistical tests of neutrality for DNA polymorphism data.
Genetics 141, 413-429.
31.
Ewens, W.J. (1972). The sampling theory of selecti=
vely
neutral alleles. Theor. Pop. Biol. =
3, 87-112.
32.&=
nbsp;
Kelly, J.K. (1997). A test of neutrality based on
interlocus associations. Genetics <=
span
style=3D'mso-bidi-font-weight:bold'>146, 1197-1206.
33.&=
nbsp;
McAllister, B.F., and McVean, G.A.T. (2000). Neutr=
al
evolution of the sex-determining gene transformer in Drosophila. Genetics 154, 1711�1720.
34.&=
nbsp;
Wall, J.D. (1999). Recombination and the power of
statistical tests of neutrality. Genet. Res. 74, 65�79
All Res. J. Biol<= /i>, 2011, 2, 1-7
������������������������������������������������=
���������
Issue
1, Vol. 2, 2011,
1-7
����������������������������� �����������������������������All Res. J. Biol, 2011,
2,
1-7
This website is optimized for the last versions of Internet Explorer (V. 7 or higher) and Firefox. We therefore advise to download (or upgrade your internet browser to) IE 7 or Firefox. All rights reserved to The All Results Journals (c).
To help promote The All Results Journals:Biol (ISSN:2172-4784) you can now download our poster and display it in your library, common room, office or laboratory.
          Â